Sign In Sign Up
menu

Michel Pereira 0 vs Tristan Connelly 3

Michel Pereira vs Tristan Connelly - UFC Fighting - 9/14/19 9:05PM
Saturday, 9/14
9:05PM Michel Pereira vs Tristan Connelly Picks & Line Moves
2308 Michel Pereira
OFF
-424
Ov 1.5 +150
2307 Tristan Connelly
OFF
+338
Un 1.5 -179

Featured Picks

Worth a look
Todd51 Todd51
Tristan Connelly +345
9/14/19 9:00pm Risked 5 units to win 17.25
WL%ROIPick Type
556921.93Fighting
556921.93Fighting moneyline
516112.95UFC Fighting
516112.95UFC Fighting moneyline

0 star rating based only on past results. Future results may vary.
Shown are the most relevant records of Todd51 for this pick.
How are ratings calculated?

Worth a look
Triplejjjsport Triplejjjsport
UNDER 1.5 -160
9/14/19 11:37am Risked 1.6 units to win 1
WL%ROIPick Type
865011.69Fighting
854811.41UFC Fighting
161114.5UFC Fighting over/under

0 star rating based only on past results. Future results may vary.
Shown are the most relevant records of Triplejjjsport for this pick.
How are ratings calculated?


View all picks and line moves


Michel Pereira Vs Tristan Connelly 9-14-2019 0 views

custom2006
Reward this post Posts

Just curious? Why did (most) folks who picked a basically unknown fighter, to beat another unknown fighter, at -400/-450 odds in this fight tonight??? I did not make a pick in this fight, because neither fighter had a (film study) history of fighting any other recognizable fighter, other than the favorite, who had one single UFC fight a few months ago. I know that most MMA "handicappers" on this site like to make blind picks on favorites, other than those few "other" "handicappers", who like to make 100% picks on dog fighters, in the hopes that they will win and be "successful" on a few dog picks.

Seriously though. Why would anyone make a pick to risk 25 units to win 5 units in ANY sport??? Would you do that in "real life"??? Why would you document this type of irresponsibility associated with your name???

To me, no matter how good your short term pick history is ... because honestly, when you make -250+ type of picks, your pick history will be "SHORT TERM" ... why would you make picks on an unknown fighter like you did tonight???

Please, could one of you -400/-450 Michel Pereira pickers explain ;-)

6
SmottGuyz
Reward this post Posts

I noticed the same thing when Kansas upset Boston College. There were 6 picks made for 5 units on Boston College ML at -1200 and no picks on the dog. That's crazy. Local bookies won't even put up a money line on a game like that because they know bettors will only take the dog and they don't want to risk the big loss. Yet, people are lining up on here to "risk" $6000 to win $500. https://www.pickmonitor.com/t/1993779/kansas-vs-boston-college This is not realistic betting.



3

custom2006 awarded 250 tokens for this post.

Michael Moderator Badge
Reward this post Posts

Man I know!!

I didn't miss a single UFC / Bellator / Pride / Strikeforce fight in the past decade. It's rare that I see a main card with a fight were I know neither fighter. Only fight on the main card I didn't bet, after the first backflip I loled at anyone who put $ on -450. Guy has 0% BF, missed weight (I think?) and was spending so much energy in the first 2 minutes, no way he won the fight passed the 1st round.

Entertaining nonetheless, it's undeniable that he has good athletic skills and he wanted to put his name out there (which he kinda did). With a good coach that can funnel his energy more efficiently the guy has potential.

4
custom2006
Reward this post Posts

... and just as I suspected, in nearly 24 hours since the fight took place, no MMA "Handicapper" that bet on the favorite would respond to my original post!

4

Please Login or Register to reply.

Ready to start winning?

Yes, Sign me up now No, show me the handicappers first