Just curious? Why did (most) folks who picked a basically unknown fighter, to beat another unknown fighter, at -400/-450 odds in this fight tonight??? I did not make a pick in this fight, because neither fighter had a (film study) history of fighting any other recognizable fighter, other than the favorite, who had one single UFC fight a few months ago. I know that most MMA "handicappers" on this site like to make blind picks on favorites, other than those few "other" "handicappers", who like to make 100% picks on dog fighters, in the hopes that they will win and be "successful" on a few dog picks.
Seriously though. Why would anyone make a pick to risk 25 units to win 5 units in ANY sport??? Would you do that in "real life"??? Why would you document this type of irresponsibility associated with your name???
To me, no matter how good your short term pick history is ... because honestly, when you make -250+ type of picks, your pick history will be "SHORT TERM" ... why would you make picks on an unknown fighter like you did tonight???
Please, could one of you -400/-450 Michel Pereira pickers explain ;-)