"Hobbs" multiplied his bankroll by 4 times by taking big odds. I believe his system works based on his knowledge works quite well. How would this affect a capper like him? Normalizing a +300 to -110, just as someone who takes favarites at -400 to -110.
Actually, I thought data was already normalized to -110 in some sense. I believe that people should flourish or crash and burn on their method. It seems to me that a new system is attempting to make losing cappers who have 60% winning, but they take -300 teams to get to the 60%.
As for money management, that is part of the game. I never take a -1600, because that is poor money management, as it would be taking a +2000 as the time.
Maybe, I don't get what you are trying to achieve. I would not attempt to make cappers who are -400 units in the hole look like champions, when people are paying for winning cappers.
Edited 11/18/14 at 10:20PM by BigBetsall - No reason listed.